Marketing and career strategist Sue Parker, says a sincere political apology is easy to spot.
It frequently relies on the wrongdoing, how long ago it happened, the political environment at the time the apology is made, and on whose behalf it is made.
But most crucially, it relies on how sincere the message is delivered.
We asked a subject matter expert to explain political apologies in general and to remark on some of the more well-known ones from recent history.
A communications and career marketing strategist at DARE Group Australia, Sue Parker claims to be able to recognize a false apology from a lightyear away.
“You can usually tell whether an apology is sincere. Genuineness always shines through, even though some politicians are skilled at projecting a different character at different times, according to her.
In a political sense, I believe it is crucial how the apology is delivered and how it is received by the audience.
NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet is cited by Ms. Parker as an illustration.
The 40-year-old Liberal leader is under a lot of fire after he admitted to donning a Nazi costume at his 21st birthday fancy dress party.
“I’m incredibly embarrassed by what I did. And I sincerely apologize for the anguish and suffering it will bring to individuals throughout our state, the Premier declared last week.
Especially Jewish people, Holocaust survivors, and veterans and their families. I apologize profusely for that dreadful error.
Jewish community leaders have accepted the apologies, but political forces are still calling for the Premier to resign.
She claims that the apology was sincere.
The way he stated it is just as important as what he said. He was visibly repentant, she said to Region.
He acknowledged the effect it had on the Jewish community, which was crucial. He extended a hand to them.
“And were his behaviors and demeanor 20 years ago consistent with those today? His current behavior is consistent with his rejection of anything anti-Semitic.
The marketing strategist contrasts the apology with those from others who place more emphasis on the effects of their acts on themselves and their family than on the people who were actually hurt by them.
The second kind of political apology is when a ruler expresses regret on behalf of their country for past crimes.
Sincerity can also be quickly judged in similar circumstances, according to Ms. Parker.
“Parliamentarians can learn a lot from this. Politicians appear to frequently find themselves in need of atonement or restitution, according to her.
“There is an inherent need to accept responsibility as stewards of the highest political offices in the land.
As the newly elected prime minister in 2008, Kevin Rudd immediately apologized to the Stolen Generations after years of his predecessor John Howard’s refusal.
John Howard only apologized. Because he didn’t care enough, he didn’t apologize, Ms. Parker added.
Kevin Rudd showed concern, and his apologies was sincere. It had an effect.
“Julia Gillard’s apologies to anyone impacted by forced adoption on behalf of the country in 2013 was also quite honest.
“You can tell when someone is being sincere when they say they’re sorry.
In general, people only express regret when they’ve been caught. This does not scream sincere remorse. Dominic Perrottet probably did not compose his apologies; politicians have skilled speech writers.
People are capable of mimicking any “sincere” look, as well as learning the appropriate phrases to use when speaking. So, the only genuine way to determine someone’s sincerity is to observe their behavior. The adage “actions speak louder than words” is true.
Did they communicate? Yes? They didn’t mean it.
Want daily delivery of the top stories from Canberra? The most popular Riotact stories are packaged each day and delivered right to your inbox. For dependable local news that will never be behind a paywall, sign up right away.